On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 14:22 -0500, Jason D. Clinton wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 13:45, Alan Cox <alan lxorguk ukuu org uk> wrote: > > People asked to have their blogs included on it and placed them on > > it by choice. It's under CC-NC licensing (*). So they've agreed to NC use > > but the foundation exploiting it commercially (or indeed any site > > reformatting it and making money from doing so) would appear to be a > > breach of copyright. > > We have agreed to an grant a copy of our blogs under no license > whatsoever; it's a one-time grant of copy, non-transferable as long as > we agree to continue to be aggregated. We are not implicitly licensing > anything. > > The Foundation cannot grant a license to anyone else because it has none. IIUC, the proposal did not say anything about granting any license, neither the terms of conditions of Readibility. However, IANAL. -- Germán Póo-Caamaño http://people.gnome.org/~gpoo/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part