Re: Minutes of the Board meeting 2005 Feb 2



<quote who="Luis Villa">

> I have no particular horse here, but I will note that if we want to use
> wiki for serious documents, we must have high quality RCS, and mediawiki
> and whatever ubuntu use have that, and live.gnome.org does not, which is a
> serious bummer.

We do our serious document authoring in CVS, and while I can see a use case
for it in the wiki, we have long had a convention (almost policy) of keeping
important stuff like that in CVS.

Meanwhile: http://live.gnome.org/FrontPage?action=info

> Also, Jeff, AFAICT, mediawiki (being the engine behind the biggest wiki in
> the world) seems to have a decent rep; dismissing it as 'fruit loops' is
> silly.

Froot Loops for GNOME's requirements, which is the context in which it was
said.

- Jeff

-- 
linux.conf.au 2005: Canberra, Australia                http://linux.conf.au/
 
   "Blessed are the cracked, for they let in the light." - Spike Milligan



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]