Re: Bounty hunt, round 2.

I was probably a bit quick earlier. Apologies for the harsh message, but
anyhow, I do feel that it would have been very appropriate that this
either 1. gets ungnomed pretty quikcly, or 2. gets postponed until there
has been a public discussion on the matter.


fre, 06.08.2004 kl. 11.02 -0400, skrev Owen Taylor:
> On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 08:05, Christoffer Olsen wrote:
> > If Srini is new, then he shouldn't have a CVS account at all - and
> > according to our policies, he should not alter I went through
> > the commits, and it seems he has done a few small patches (five I
> > believe) for GNOME projects, which is a good thing. But I don't believe
> > that he is "a useful and frequent contributor" [1] to the
> > website, and I don't believe he should be the one changing things.
> The standard policy for GNOME CVS is one where delegation is allowed.
> Once Nat got permission from the web team to create the bounties
> page, it was perfectly legitimate for him to turn over maintainence
> to Srinivasa.
> The fact that that page doesn't convey the right message; that 
> it implies these bounties were decided by the GNOME project isn't a
> problem with CVS commit rights, but rather a communication issue
> at other levels. 
> Regards,
>  					Owen
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-list mailing list
> foundation-list gnome org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dette er en digitalt signert meldingsdel

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]