Re: Bounty hunt, round 2.

[Mikael Hallendal <micke imendio com>]

On fre, 2004-08-06 at 10:55 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 05:39, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > Hi Nat,
> > 	Curiously, you've ignored the concern Mikael expressed about the change
> > from Epiphany to Firefox in the bounties. If the bounties were hosted on
> > novell.com and it was clear that this was a Novell initiative I wouldn't
> > have the slightest problem with that. 
> 
> I expect that the text on the bounties page will be changed to reflect
> what Nat said in his mail; that these bounties are a Novell initiative
> being done in cooperation with the GNOME foundation not a GNOME
> initiative.

In my opinion it needs to clearly stated that the GNOME foundation has
nothing to do with the bounties. Otherwise it's going to convey a
confusing message (especially in the case where bounties target projects
competing with projects already in GNOME, firefox vs. epiphany for
example).

I think it would be better to just mention GNOME foundation in the sense
that it's used to channel the money through and nothing else.

Regards,
  Mikael Hallendal
-- 
Imendio HB, http://www.imendio.com/