Re: election plans

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Bart Decrem <bart@eazel.com> writes:
> 
> If we use email votes on a Mailman list, as I proposed, than the election is
> archived so everyone could verify the election results for themselves.  We
> would still need an 'official committee' to announce the results, because
> there might be some invalid/ambiguous votes.  That should be 2 or 3 people
> from the steering committee, since one of the steering committee's tasks was
> to launch the foundation.
> 

I was thinking the ballots would be secret, I guess. I can certainly
see advantages to a public ballot, especially if we don't use GPG
signatures. However I'm a bit worried about people getting upset about
how so-and-so voted, etc., etc.

Havoc