Re: Could we discuss the patch again on gal atk implementation? was:Re: [evolution-patches] Re: GAL status

[Mike Kestner <mkestner ximian com>]

On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 05:55, Gilbert Fang wrote:

> > <mk> Hopefully somebody who understands atk has reviewed this too?  I
> > don't really know enough about it to give an informed opinion on this
> > factory code.</mk>
> 
> In fact, The actually GAIL module (gnome atk implementation library)
> owner Padraig discussed with us and  told us on how to do atk
> implentation on custom gtkwidget. There is a draft paper by him in 
> attachment

That's not what I asked.  I asked if somebody had reviewed the patch to
ensure you properly converted the draft paper into code.  :)

> Let me explain why libgal-a11y-2.0 is linked into libgal and why e-text
> and e-table in the future is/will be linked into libgal-a11y-2.0.so. 
[snip]
> Then, you see, in the view of source code, e-text will call 
> gal_a11y_e_text_get_type at least. That is why I have to link 
> libgal-2.0 against libgal-a11y-2.0.so. 

Go ahead and commit this patch.

> I also attach the e-paned atk implementation patch (merge.patch_v2)  for
> your reference.

I'm confused, are you asking for permission to commit that?  There's no
need to commit an atk implementation for epaned.  All users of epaned
should transition to gtkpaned since epaned is no longer built in gal
trunk.

-- 
Mike Kestner <mkestner ximian com>