Re: Could we discuss the patch again on gal atk implementation? was:Re: [evolution-patches] Re: GAL status

[Gilbert Fang <gilbert fang sun com>]

On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 05:31, Mike Kestner wrote:

> 
> > Let me explain why libgal-a11y-2.0 is linked into libgal and why e-text
> > and e-table in the future is/will be linked into libgal-a11y-2.0.so. 
> [snip]
> > Then, you see, in the view of source code, e-text will call 
> > gal_a11y_e_text_get_type at least. That is why I have to link 
> > libgal-2.0 against libgal-a11y-2.0.so. 
> 
> Go ahead and commit this patch.
> 
Thanks. I have committed the patch. 
Anyway, I want to notice one thing for RE. 
As I know, the original libgal-a11y-2.0.so is rpm-packaged as
libgal-modules. Now, this package should be obsolete. And libgal rpm
should package the new libgal-a11y-2.0.so. 
Anyway, I am not sure whether you will do such release anymore. But we
have an nightly build and packaging. Just an reminder.

> > I also attach the e-paned atk implementation patch (merge.patch_v2)  for
> > your reference.
> 
> I'm confused, are you asking for permission to commit that?  There's no
> need to commit an atk implementation for epaned.  All users of epaned
> should transition to gtkpaned since epaned is no longer built in gal
> trunk.

sorry for confusing. I do so just to show the way how we now implement
atk object for custom widgets. So, please forget it. 

Gilbert