Re: Could we discuss the patch again on gal atk implementation? was:Re: [evolution-patches] Re: GAL status
- From: Mike Kestner <mkestner ximian com>
- To: Gilbert Fang <gilbert fang sun com>
- Cc: Ettore Perazzoli <ettore ximian com>, Henry Jia <Henry Jia sun com>, "evolution-patches ximian com" <evolution-patches ximian com>, SCERI Evolution Accessibility <sceri-evolution-acc sun com>
- Subject: Re: Could we discuss the patch again on gal atk implementation? was:Re: [evolution-patches] Re: GAL status
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 13:04:21 -0500
Hi Gilbert,
On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 23:03, Gilbert Fang wrote:
> 1) Remove the original libgal-a11y-2.0.so (which is rpm packaged as
> libgal-modules). Instead of that, we create a new library
> libgal-a11y.so for atk support. libgal-a11y.so is not a gtk modules at
> all, and it should be installed with libgal before gal is dead totally.
If that's the way it's supposed to be done, we should change to that
approach in gal. I would prefer to keep the -2.0 versioning in the
libname though.
> 2) atk object implementation for epaned. The source code for this part
> are all under gal/a11y/e-paned.
I committed a patch to remove e-paned from the build today, along with
removing the e-scroll-frame and e-[hv]scrollbar. EPaned and subclasses
no longer exist in gal as of version 1.99.9 which was tagged and
tarballed today.
> At least, part 2 is not harmful. So could I check the whole patch to gal
> HEAD,or I have to split the patch and make the part 1 into HEAD?
Please split out part 1 since part 2 is no longer necessary. Thanks.
--
Mike Kestner <mkestner ximian com>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]