That's why I was wondering if anyone could be so kind to send me an encrypted email (7C174863), and I could give a short answer, just to put this at rest. Then I'd know for sure that my set-up is correct. IF anyone have the time. SRW fr. den 05. 02. 2016 klokka 12.45 (+0000) skreiv Patrick O'Callaghan:
On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 13:15 +0100, Stig Roar Wangberg wrote:Ah, I think I'm beginning to understand. So this is another form of encryption, still using the receiver's public key, and s/he still has to use his or her private key to decrypt the message?It's not *another* form of encryption. It's how PGP encryption works. The receiver's public key is used to encrypt a random symmetric session key which in turn is used to encrypt the message body. The receiver uses his/her private key to decrypt the symmetric session key and thence the message. Consult any of the docs on PGP for more detail, or read Zimmerman's book. Public key systems nearly always work this way because it would be too expensive to use the asymmetric algorithms on the message body itself. As for *signing* the message, that uses your private key to encrypt a hash of the message. It can then be checked by anyone with access to your public key. poc _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list gnome org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part