Re: [Evolution] Strange line wrapping in 3.15.92+



On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 02:56 +0100, Ángel González wrote:
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Here are misc peculiarities I just noticed in lates Evo(don't know if that are in
earlier releases):

1)
Hovering over a web link(https://....com) in a received msg I can open that link
in my webrowser but when I hit reply and hovers over the link Evo does not
recognize the link, it is just text.

Supposing that it's a plain text message, it doesn't seem unreasonable.

Maybe, I would like be able to send it to my browser thogh




2)
This mail(in swedish):
----------
.... att vi inte behöver släppa detta nu... De kommer ju inte uppgraderas hursom MEN det hade varit bra 
att:

1. Testa att det kommer att funka den dag det behövs en ny boot/kernel. 2. Checka in ändringarna så det 
kommer med i nästa bygge vi vill göra av boot/kernel så det följer med per automatik då.
-------------
Looks like this in View Msg Source:
-------------
.... att vi inte beh=F6ver sl=E4ppa detta nu... De kommer ju inte u= ppgraderas hursom MEN det hade varit 
bra att:=0A=
=0A=
1. Testa att det kommer att funka den dag det beh=F6vs en ny boot/kernel.=
=0A=
2. Checka in =E4ndringarna s=E5 det kommer med i n=E4sta bygge vi vill g=F6=
ra av boot/kernel s=E5 det f=F6ljer med per automatik d=E5.=0A=
-----------
Why the line breaks/wraps?

To avoid too-long lines.

This looks more like random line breaks, these lines are much shorter than the ones in
my other windows and much harde to read.



Must '\n' be displayed as =0A= ?
The message is in quoted-printable. The =0A represents a \n (just as =E4 is ä ina a iso-8859 variant). The =
means "this is an artificial line break, join this with the next line"



Doing reply messes with line breaks:
-----
... att vi inte behöver släppa detta nu... De kommer ju inte uppgraderas hursom MEN det hade varit 
bra att:

1. Testa att det kommer att funka den dag det behövs en ny boot/kernel. 2. Checka in ändringarna så det 
kommer med i nästa bygge vi vill göra av boot/kernel så det följer med per automatik då.
----
Extra '\n' before "bra att:"

Probably because by adding the leading >  now the line should break earlier (actually, there's no *need* to 
do that, the line could b eup to 998 bytes, but the MUA thinks it's a good idea).

Precisely, lets not add random \n 



Notice how '\n' is lost just before "2. Checka..."

That looks like a bug.

Yes, very much so


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]