GNOME.org
 

Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 117, Issue 22

Thanks mate.

People would have spread wrong information that Evolution is supported for Windows clients/Exchange.

Anyway if you have future plan, pls share. Thanks. 


S. Rajini 
 


Please consider the environment before printing this email


-----Original Message-----
From: evolution-list [mailto:evolution-list-bounces gnome org] On Behalf Of evolution-list-request gnome org
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 5:30 PM
To: evolution-list gnome org
Subject: evolution-list Digest, Vol 117, Issue 22

Send evolution-list mailing list submissions to
        evolution-list gnome org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        evolution-list-request gnome org

You can reach the person managing the list at
        evolution-list-owner gnome org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of evolution-list 
digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re:  FW: Evolution email client for Windows 7
      (Adam Tauno Williams)
   2. Re:  3.16.1 issues (on Arch) (Carl Schaefer)
   3. Re:  Evolution 3.85/Centos7/SSL does not work (Lee Moberg)
   4. Re:  Evolution 3.85/Centos7/SSL does not work (Pete Biggs)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 10:38:44 -0400
From: Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam whitemice org>
To: evolution-list gnome org
Subject: Re: [Evolution] FW: Evolution email client for Windows 7
Message-ID: <1429799924 2697 1 camel whitemice org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"

On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 07:06 +0000, Srinivasan, Rajini wrote:

Team,
I have tried with the below download link, but even after downloading 
when I try to extract its getting erro saying the file is broken


It does not matter where you downloaded it from - it does not work.
There is not even remotely recent build of Evolution for Windows.

If you have something it is *ancient* and should not be used.

--
Adam Tauno Williams <mailto:awilliam whitemice org> GPG D95ED383 Systems Administrator, Python Developer, LPI 
/ NCLA



------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 12:33:22 -0400
From: Carl Schaefer <schaefer trilug org>
To: evolution-list gnome org
Subject: Re: [Evolution] 3.16.1 issues (on Arch)
Message-ID: <1429806802 31808 1 camel trilug org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"


I added a second instance
of the same Gmail account in Evolution, using the same preferences
settings, and no problem is reported for the new instance.


That would be weird. There will be some difference, being it probably
with the connection type or the way the account was added (like
whether at the end you checked to add also calendar sources or not -
that creates different type of the account configuration, even those
can be exposed similarly in the UI). Evolution uses .source files in
~/.config/evolution/sources which describe the account. There are
multiple (three) files for each mail account. Maybe you can compare
those raw files for differences.


the old instance has source files with this structure:

[Collection]
  [Mail Composition]
  [Mail Account]
  [Mail Transport]

the new instance has these source files:

[Mail Account]
  [Mail Composition]
  [Mail Transport]

the old instance "Collection" file had this section:

[Authentication]
Host=
Method=none
Port=0
RememberPassword=true
User=
ProxyUid=system-proxy
CredentialName=

which looked troublesome, so I tried deleting it and found that the
connection error on startup went away, and no new problems have
appeared.  Thank you for pointing me towards the sources directory.

Carl


------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 19:50:59 -0700
From: Lee Moberg <mobergl wavecable com>
To: evolution-list gnome org
Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution 3.85/Centos7/SSL does not work
Message-ID: <1429843859 3111 12 camel localhost localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Good question, I can't check now.  I removed Centos 7 and put Centos 6
back with the older version of Evolution that did not have the SSL
issue.  There are too many things in the version of Gnome on Centos 7 I
didn't like.  It would be fine for a server sitting in a rack someplace,
but as my personal workstation I'm not going to put up with it.  Feels
too much like Windows the way things got renamed, moved or removed,
tweaking the configuration was a pain (like icon and font sizes, by
default it reminded me of Windows in safe mode).  I'll give it a couple
of years to mature and try it again.



On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 11:57 +0200, Tom wrote:

Am Donnerstag, den 23.04.2015, 10:33 +0200 schrieb Andre Klapper: 

On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 09:26 -0700, Lee Moberg wrote:

Error while Fetching mail from 'my ISP mail server'
Could not connect to 'my ISP mail server':995:  SSL peer was not
expecting a handshake message it received.


Verified working settings in Evolution 2.32.3:

Receiving mail
type pop
server my ISP mail server   port 995
SSL encryption
Auth type: password


Out of curiosity, have you tried using STARTTLS instead of SSL?

andre


... just for clarification: I guess 3.8.5 is meant here ?
Or is there another versioning scheme on CENTOS ?
--
Best,
Thomas

_______________________________________________
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list gnome org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list





------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 09:42:01 +0100
From: Pete Biggs <pete biggs org uk>
To: evolution-list gnome org
Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution 3.85/Centos7/SSL does not work
Message-ID: <1429864921 2392 16 camel biggs org uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 19:50 -0700, Lee Moberg wrote:

Good question, I can't check now. 


The version of Evolution in CentOS 7 is 3.8.5


 I removed Centos 7 and put Centos 6
back with the older version of Evolution that did not have the SSL
issue.  There are too many things in the version of Gnome on Centos 7 I
didn't like.  


That'll be Gnome 3.  Gnome 3 is a Good Thing. But this is not the place
for that sort of discussion.  It's just different, that's all.


It would be fine for a server sitting in a rack someplace,
but as my personal workstation I'm not going to put up with it.


Well, from a server admin's point of view, RHEL7 / CentOS7 is much more
geared up for graphical interfaces and use as a workstation!  


  Feels
too much like Windows the way things got renamed, moved or removed,


I can't think of anything more removed from Windows than Gnome3!
Although I do dislike some of the extensions RHEL7 has put on it to try
and make it more "comfortable" for users.


tweaking the configuration was a pain (like icon and font sizes, by
default it reminded me of Windows in safe mode). 


What you need is 'gnome-tweak-tool' - that's how you change how Gnome
looks.


 I'll give it a couple
of years to mature and try it again.


It is mature - it's already had a few years, that's the point of
RHEL/CentOS.  Nothing fundamental is going to change in the lifetime of
that particular OS.  If want the "proper" Gnome3 experience, try Fedora
- F22 is out in a month or so and that has Gnome 3.16 on it.

P.




------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


------------------------------

End of evolution-list Digest, Vol 117, Issue 22
***********************************************

This email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please delete all copies and notify the sender immediately. You may wish to refer to the 
incorporation details of Standard Chartered PLC, Standard Chartered Bank and their subsidiaries at 
https://www.sc.com/en/incorporation-details.html
[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]