Re: [Evolution] Reply-To: field on the evolution list

[Philippe LeCavalier <support plecavalier com>]

On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 12:40 -0400, Art Alexion wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 06:00 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > I think the project, and the application, is doing great.  Compared to
> > the Evolution of old this app rocks (and compared to every other Open
> > Source e-mail/calendar client - Evo is leaps and bounds ahead of
> > anything else, it is hard to even consider them in the same category).
>
> I like Kontact.  I use it for personal mail.  Each has its advantages
> and disadvantages.
>
> Kontact excels at customizability and user control.  It seems to have
> fewer bugs than Evo and does gmail IMAP better than evo or thunderbird.
>
> Evo excels at Exchange connectivity and HTML rendering and editing.
>
> I think the Evo developers are extremely responsive, and often hold them
> out as an example of why Open Source is so good. (and incidentally, so
> is Ingo Klöcker the kmail developer.)
I agree with Adam. I used Kontact for quite a while and prefer Evo. And for what's it's worth I use 2.26.3 on Debian w/XFCE4 and it has yet to crash, ever.

Cheers,
Phil