Re: [Evolution] scalabilty issues resolved in next major release (2.6.28)?

[Jo-Erlend Schinstad <joerlend schinstad gmail com>]

2009/8/24 Brian J. Murrell <brian interlinx bc ca>:
> On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 15:03 +0200, Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote:
> > [snip] "...aggregates all of my newsgroups says there are 418389 messages in it
> > with 418344 unread (i.e. only 5 unread messages -- yeah right).  However
> > I know the difference bet..." [snip]
> >
> > This suggests to me like you may have a buggy calculator too, or something.
>
> Oops.  It was 50 instead of 5.  Dude.  I misread a single order of
> magnitude while the real difference should be 2 or 3 orders of magnitude
> different.  Why are you splitting hairs here?  Do you really think this
> is constructive?
>
> b.

If there are 418389 messages in total, of which 418344 are unread, then
that means you've read 45 of them, doesn't it? You never actually said how
many you did read.

Jo-Erlend