Re: [Evolution] Does Evolution really need to be so terribly bad?

[Patrick O'Callaghan <poc usb ve>]

On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 07:44 +1000, Ian Mortimer wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 11:23 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> > > Is this also the case when your account is exchange-based?
> >
> > I have no direct knowledge of this, but I believe Evo tries to be
> > consistent and applies the IMAP model across the board. It also does it
> > with local (i.e. POP) mail.
>
> The last time I connected Evolution to Exchange was with 2.12.
> At that time it followed the Exchange model: deleted messages were
> moved to the "Deleted Items" folder.  
>
> I haven't been able to get 2.22.3.1 to work with our Exchange server
> except as an imap client so I can't say if that's still the case.

OK, that's useful to know. It would also seem to imply that there could
be surprises in store for anyone who mixes IMAP-mode Exchange access
with the other thing (since they have two different models of what
"delete" means).

poc