Re: [Evolution] outlook/word

[Patrick O'Callaghan <poc usb ve>]

On Sat, 2008-06-14 at 16:34 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-06-14 at 10:51 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-06-14 at 08:04 -0700, Axel wrote:
> > > Don't we think we can advance to RTF or HTML in 2008. I mean ascii or
> > > plain text was already there in BBS times. I agree on it not
> > > being .doc or docx or odt format, but HTML and RTF are universally
> > > usable formats, that every email app should be able to use and users
> > > should not need to think about the format or this anymore.
> >
> > Please don't top-post.
> >
> > I agree that email clients have to support HTML and probably RTF at
> > least for reading.
>
> I disagree.  I have plenty of users who use pine or elm for reading
> their email - that's up to them, they are both perfectly acceptable mail
> clients and neither support anything other than straight text.

As you say, it's up to them.

poc