Re: [Evolution] spam filtering

["Scott T. Hildreth" <shild sbcglobal net>]

On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 11:08 -0400, Andrew Montalenti wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 13:02 -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
> ...
> > Bogofilter, in my experience.  It's not even close.  After training, my
> > spamassassin never got better than 90% catch rate, which is still some
> > hundred spams a day for me.  Bogofilter is 99.9% at least, probably
> > better.  False positive rate is better too.

  I was ready to switch to Bogofilter unitl I upgraded to 3.2.  I would 
  have to mark so many emails as spam in previous versions, but now I 
  get damn near zero spam in my inbox.  If anything it is a little 2 
  aggressive, but I'd rather have that than  having it only catch half
  of the spam.


> That's interesting... I'm wondering, is there a way to migrate your
> SpamAssassin tokens database (the stuff stored in .spamassassin/*) to
> bogofilter?  And, does anyone know what accounts, specifically, for its
> better accuracy over SA?
>
> Andrew
>
> _______________________________________________
> Evolution-list mailing list
> Evolution-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list