Re: [Evolution] Multiple namespace support with IMAP

[Jason Carr <jason flacid org>]

Anybody else have any ideas?  I can see the folders in Thunderbird.  It
used to work in the old IMAP4rev1 server type.  Again, I'm running
Evolution 2.10.3.


Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 10:52 -0400, Jason Carr wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 09:29 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 18:48 -0400, Jason Carr wrote:
> > > > My mail server is setup like this:
> > > >
> > > > INBOX
> > > >  +--fruits
> > > >  +--veggies
> > > >  +--meats
> > > > cheese
> > > >  +--swiss
> > > >  +--cheddar
> > > > pizza
> > > >  +--buffalowing
> > > >  +--taco
> > > >
> > > > So I can only get access to INBOX via Evolution.  I've set "Override
> > > > server-supplied folder namespace" in "Receiving Options" and left
> > > > Namespace: blank.  I've tried a variety of different options Evo can
> > > > never seem to see my cheese and pizza boxes.  I'm using IMAP for the
> > > > server type.
> > > >
> > > > Is there something I can do to enable this behavior?
> > > Why are you setting "Override server-supplied namespace" if the server
> > > is set up the way you want? Works for me, using a Cyrus server and *not*
> > > setting this option.
> > >
> > > poc
> > Okay, I unchecked the option and restarted Evolution.  I go into the
> > Folder Subscriptions and I only see Inbox and the folders underneith
> > Inbox.
> >
> > I'm also using Cyrus...
>
> As an experiment, I tried creating a subfolder of INBOX, but got an
> error message saying that INBOX could not contain subfolders. I know my
> server is configured to support the "anonymous root" model rather than
> the default Cyrus "INBOX root" model, so that may explain the
> difference.
>
> Can you see your folder hierarchy with other IMAP clients, e.g.
> Thunderbird? Also, you don't say what version of Evo you have.
>
> poc