Re: [Evolution] evolution stability faq

[Hans <hvdmerwe sunspace co za>]

On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 10:18 +0100, William Murray wrote:
> > nd other assertions that just makes everything run slower.
> > > > But yes its to unstable at the moment to have my dad use it.
> > > >
> > > > Sorry, had to get that off my chest.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >  
> > >  I have much the same issues; only on Fedora-5. This is with Exchange 2003.
> > > Evolution is essentially required for me, but it is too slow and 
> > > unstable at the
> > > moment to have my son use it. :-)
> > >        
> >
> > I suggest you try Evolution and Evolution-exchange 2.6 packages which
> > was primarily a release focused on improved stability.  You can also
> > verify from the bugzilla if your particular issue has been resolved in
> > the last stable release.
> >
> > Harish
>  Hello Harish,
>              Fedora 5 has evolution-2.6.1-1.fc5.2, and
> evolution-connector-2.6.1-1.fc5.1, and reliability is
> big improvement on 2.4 series. The only thing which crashes much
> for me is to do with deleting shared meetings in the calendar. 
> It was the reference to Dad not being up to it which bother me!

Please note I did say MY dad (not all dads), meaning my dad does not
know about all these issues in the background that makes everything
work, he just wants to read email, like all of us really,
so to rephrase, "Its to unstable to have my limited-computer-illiterate
dad use it"
Better?

 


E-mail Disclaimer
http://www.sunspace.co.za/emaildisclaimer.htm