Re: [Evolution] Reply To List (right click Feature) in evo-2.2.1.1

[Ow Mun Heng <Ow Mun Heng wdc com>]

On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 08:56 +0530, Not Zed wrote:
> > > > Am Montag, den 16.05.2005, 11:45 +0800 schrieb Ow Mun Heng:

> > Then why have the "mark as Junk, mark as NOT junk". 
> > Nevermind... I believe      the devs have their reasons.
>
> Please don't blame us.  It wasn't us.  It was the UI team.  Wait till
> you see the latest menu reorganisation, even more functionality removed
> and other common stuff harder to get to.  Not the developers either.

Did I come across as blaming?? Sorry. Didn't mean to. You guys are doing
a good job.

I can hardly wait. You know what I want in Evo? I want the "To:" Box to
be wrapped when I type in more than the length of the box? (instead of
it just pushing to the right)



> > > > > It's nice to be able to do that using the mouse as well as the Shortcut
> > > > > key. Now, I have to manually go to Actions and select reply to list.
> > > >
> > > > what about using [ctrl + l]?  the shortcut is much faster... ;-)
> >
> > That's a reason why I use the mouse instead of the keyboard.
> > I see a message I want to read, I use the mouse to click on it, then if
> > I decide to reply to it, my hand doesn't actually leave the mouse ,hence
> > easier to  right click, and then select which mailbox I want the reply
> > to come from.
> >
> > > > > Is it end-user hackable?
> > > >
> > > > afaik no.
> > >
> > > You could put it back in using a plugin :)
> >
> > Hmm.. Yeah... Then it'll be another thing to add on my already growing
> > todo list. 
> >
> > Say.. how simple or hard is it to write a plugin anyway.
>
> Very easy, at least for something like that.  All the code which
> implements it is still there anyway, so it should only be a few lines of
> code to re-hook it up.


Well.. i guess it's time for me to add that to my growing to-do list.


-- 
Ow Mun Heng
Gentoo/Linux on DELL D600 1.4Ghz 1.5GB RAM
98% Microsoft(tm) Free!! 
Neuromancer 11:31:17 up 19:45, 7 users, load average: 3.00, 2.27, 2.03