Re: [Evolution] Moving evolution 1.5



On Thu, 2004-09-02 at 12:50 -0600, Richard Zach wrote:

On Thu, 2004-09-02 at 11:32 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote: 
On Thu, 2004-09-02 at 02:11 -0600, Richard Zach wrote:
What does it take to move an evolution setup in 1.5?  In 1.4, all I had
to do was copy ~/evolution, and I'd have all my accounts set up,
addressbook and calendar.   With a copy of .gnome2/gnome-pilot.d I'd
also have my gpilotd setup and sync status.  Now I've set up a new
machine (on Suse 9.1) and copied ~/.evolution (ie, my 1.5 profile &
files), but whenever I call evolution-1.5 it insists on a new
installation and my old address book etc. are not available.

you need to copy also ~/.gconf/apps/evolution, which is where all
accounts and other configuration are kept.

Thanks!  That seemed to work (better), but now I'm running into another
problem. I copied .gconf/apps/evolution and .evolution from the old to
the new machine.  My mail accounts are there (both local and imap), but
I can't open addressbook, calendar, or tasks.  I get this on the
console:

This is what I see on the console:

zach mx80:~> evolution-1.5
evolution-shell-Message: Killing old version of evolution-data-server...
asked to activate component_id `OAFIID:
GNOME_Evolution_Addressbook_Component:1.5'
 
(evolution-1.5:5675): camel-WARNING **: Invalid root:
'/home/zach/.evolution/mail/local/Outbox.ibex.index'
 
(evolution-1.5:5675): camel-WARNING **: version: TEXT.000 (TEXT.000)
 
(evolution-1.5:5675): camel-WARNING **: block size: 1024 (1024) OK
 
(evolution-1.5:5675): camel-WARNING **: free: 0 (0 add size < 1024) OK
 
(evolution-1.5:5675): camel-WARNING **: last: 6144 (6144 and size: 1024)
BAD
 
(evolution-1.5:5675): camel-WARNING **: flags: unSYNC
asked to activate component_id `OAFIID:
GNOME_Evolution_Addressbook_Component:1.5'
calendar-gui-Message: launch_alarm_daemon_cb(): Failed to
execute /opt/gnome/libexec/evolution/1.5/evolution-alarm-notify: 13
(Permission denied)

see http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=60535 for this. It seems
to be a packaging problem.

Maybe the others are related, not sure.
-- 
Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo novell com>




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]