Re: [Evolution] PGP signature as attachment when unverified
- From: Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>
- To: Alexandre Aractingi <aaractingi libertysurf fr>
- Cc: Liste Evolution <evolution lists ximian com>
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] PGP signature as attachment when unverified
- Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:09:04 -0500
the toplevel multipart/mixed is what is throwing evolution off. this
isn't really related to s/mime vs pgp, since they both use *just*
multipart/signed. The "problem" is the sending agent is encapsulating
the signed portion within another multipart part.
On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 06:39, Alexandre Aractingi wrote:
Le mercredi 17 novembre 2004 à 12:50 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast a écrit :
correctness of the signature has nothing to do with the presence of the
paperclip icon in the message-list.
That I would expect, I also thought it was weird :-)
I believe that local mail won't show a paperclip if the message is a
multipart/signed, while imap is bugged and shows a paperclip icon for
Weird... I currently view your mail in a local mailbox (from POP3) and
no paperclip shows up. I moved it on my IMAP dir and it is still ok.
But I also happen to have an email from Damien Sandras (GnomeMeeting
maintainer), which shows the paperclip (it uses GPP). I read in the
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1201726096=="
And later on:
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
While yours only has (header):
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1;
And later on:
Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name=smime.p7s
Is that difference coming from the GPG vs S/MIME used? Or is there
] [Thread Prev