Re: Evo overhead (was Re: [Evolution] Connector GPLed!!!)
- From: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- To: Ron Johnson <ron l johnson cox net>
- Cc: evolution lists ximian com
- Subject: Re: Evo overhead (was Re: [Evolution] Connector GPLed!!!)
- Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 18:29:27 +0800
On Sun, 2004-05-16 at 22:13 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 10:25 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 17:12 +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
tir, 11.05.2004 kl. 18.03 skrev Jeffrey Stedfast:
In what way? Our only overhead is indexes and summary files which are a tiny fraction of the actual message content.
more economical clients (Kmail for a start).
Well, I wouldn't go so far as say "tiny". 20-30% is my experience with IMAP-stored email,
and 20-90% overhead on .evolution/mail/local email.
Huh. Please explain.
I'm lucky to get 5% for local mail and much less than that for imap email.
I must say, though, that it seems better in 1.5 than it did in 1.[0-4].
This is rubbish. The files have got bigger in 1.5, although by a miniscule amount. But they are definitely not smaller.
] [Thread Prev