Re: [Evolution] HTML mail

On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 12:52 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 06:26 +0200, Martin Skjöldebrand wrote: 
 another option for this.  The actual option imo is pretty archaic
anyway, just to cater for the bsd/mailx using set, and others still
stuck in the 80's (alhough many spam filters pick up html mail too).

Them's fightin' words, there, pardner....  Especially because I know
many mutt users.

Plaintext is the universal and most efficient way to send email.

And... it's ineffective to embed worms/viruses in text mail, there-
for, it's more secure.

Ron Johnson <ron l johnson cox net>

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]