Re: [Evolution] HTML mail

[Ron Johnson <ron l johnson cox net>]

On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 12:52 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 06:26 +0200, Martin Skjöldebrand wrote: 
> [snip]
>  another option for this.  The actual option imo is pretty archaic
> anyway, just to cater for the bsd/mailx using set, and others still
> stuck in the 80's (alhough many spam filters pick up html mail too).

Them's fightin' words, there, pardner....  Especially because I know
many mutt users.

Plaintext is the universal and most efficient way to send email.

And... it's ineffective to embed worms/viruses in text mail, there-
for, it's more secure.

-- 
Ron Johnson <ron l johnson cox net>