On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 11:43, Sudhakar Govindavajhala wrote:
You can also do it manually (if you have an extensive list of emails) by clicking on "view -> Reply-To Field" and putting a check in that option.I have something like this in my mind. The thing is that I would like not to expose my original email address. For this, I need to mask both the From and reply-to address. So, what you said only solves half the problem. :-) Sudhakar.
Sounds to me like you want to "munge" the headers, which is a much more advanced idea than Evo allows. To do this you are going to have to use something more lower level than Evolution. It would not be a good practise for Evo to _easily_ send emails without a FROM header. That would be a sad day indeed as any John Doe could become a spammer. You may need to write a text filter program to overwrite the "FROM:" header with the "REPLY-TO" header and then strip out the REPLY-TO header. Some simple perl code should do the trick and then pipe your message to `sendmail` for it to hit the MTA (sendmail/postfix/whatever) to send it on it's way. People talk about using procmail to filter INCOMING messages, I'm not sure if it could do outgoing. Good luck, Chris -- Software Engineering IV, McMaster University PGP Public Key: http://nesser.org/pgp-key/ 11:46:39 up 2:56, 3 users, load average: 0.19, 0.70, 0.84 Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part