Re: [Evolution] to many virus

On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 06:29 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 11:30 +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 05:35, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 15:00 -0500, boricua pepino is-a-geek org wrote:
Right on. (Or at least till LInux gets so mainstream
that virus writers targets linux, but then again, 
linux users are more-or-less better disciplined to 
"not" click at everything :-)

Ugh.  Do you *really* believe that Linux apps are as insecurely
*designed* as Windows apps?

Contemporarily, linux apps are most often better designed, from a
security vantage point, than windows apps.

However, after linux gains broader acceptance (which is only a matter of
time), many of the same braindead developers that write for windows now,
will move to developing for linux or linux and windows.

At that point, a greater percentage of linux apps will suck too.  :-S

You can say "Well, linux distributors are smart enough not to bundle
those badly written apps", but there will be a larger percentage of
braindead linux distributors then too.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]