Re: [Evolution] Evolution 1.4.4 performance on KDE 3.1
- From: Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>
- To: Paul Hands <phands cadence com>
- Cc: evolution lists ximian com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution 1.4.4 performance on KDE 3.1
- Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 13:29:10 -0400
change your gtk theme to a non-pixmap theme and it will stop being so
slow.
Jeff
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 13:25, Paul Hands wrote:
Jeff, answers embedded...........
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 17:00, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
Does the RENDER X extension work properly on your system?
It looks OK. The XFree86 log file shows that RENDER is loading OK,
and there are no errors regarding the extension.
(do you get errors like "Xlib: extension "RENDER" missing on display
:0.0" ?)
all I know is that my laptop (p3 600 w/ 128 megs of RAM running RedHat 9
w/ XD2 running default setup) sounds like it runs evolution faster than
your 2 gigahertz + 2gig of ram desktop machine, which seems a bit
strange... no? I'll grant you that w/ 128 megs of ram and a 256 meg swap
partition, things are not exactly snappy - but redraws and plenty fast.
It is infuriatingly slow, especially for a high spec machine. The
reason I am back with the SuSE version is that I had installed XD2
when this all started, and I mistakenly thought going back might fix
it. That's also why I suspect that my gnome configuration is broken
somewhere. I tried a doorman-reset and also moving all my .gnome and
.gconf stuff temporarily, but no luck.
the browser config setting thing has more to do with what arguments you
pass to the browser command-line than a bug in GNOME. If I try to launch
mozilla more than once on my machine from the command-line, it often
won't let me - asking me to select a different profile.
That's the net effect.
you probably need to do something like: mozilla --new-window
I use mozilla -remote "openurl($arg, new-window)" with some
surroundings to catch the cases where there either is or isn't a
browser already running.
(you'd have to read up on the mozilla command-line options to know for
sure, I was just making that one up).
what other preferences "get ignored"? They all seem to work fine for
me...
Setting file handlers just doesn't seem to work. I set the preference
for html docs to various things, including just launching a shell. No
change is effective, the system just doesn't "see" them.
Jeff
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 11:32, Paul Hands wrote:
Jeff,
You may well be right regarding configuration, but what in
particular? I suspect that something is wrong with my gnome
configuration in general, because I cannot get evolution to open a web
browser if one is already running - all my settings in
gnome-control-center seem to get ignored. I "fixed" it by changing
the mozilla script in the mozilla installation.
So far, as you say, all responses seem to be from SuSE 8.2 users.
However, 1.2.2 is OK on the same setup.
Paul
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 16:07, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
sounds like your system is incorrectly configured. This is certainly
*not* an evolution bug if it is only reproducable on SuSE 8.2 (which
seems to be the case based on other responses in this thread).
Make sure that hardware acceleration is working properly
Jeff
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 07:27, Paul Hands wrote:
Hi folks,
Should I submit the following as a bug?
I'm running evolution 1.4.4 (and also the latest snaps - no
difference) on KDE 3.1 (various versions - 3.1.1, 3.1.3) on SuSE 8.2.
System is a 2Ghz IBM T30 laptop with 2G RAM, Radeon mobility graphics
adaptor, XFree86-4.3.0-15.
The graphics performance is awful.
Anything which causes a window redraw (without changing window sizes)
takes around 8 seconds to complete. That includes changing folders -
something which happens a lot. The redraw of the summary and preview
panes takes the most time - the folder bar needs about 3 seconds to
look complete.
If I resize the window (main or composer) the redraw can take up to
30 seconds. During that time, the mouse cursor is grabbed, and is
restricted to a screen area which seems to be the old size of the
window.
If I switch into a gnome session (gnome 2.2 as supplied with the SuSE
distro) instead of KDE, graphics performance is fine.
I don't want to start a gnome versus KDE thread here - it serves no
purpose. However, I bet a lot of evolution users are on KDE as well,
and therefore I'd like to know..............
1. Is it just me, or are other KDE users seeing this. If so, what
distro etc?
2. Is it restricted to Evolution, or are other gnome apps affected in
the same way?
and of course,
3. Is it worth submitting a bug?
Regards,
Paul
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
fejj ximian com - www.ximian.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]