Re: [Evolution] Evolution 1.4.4 performance on KDE 3.1

[Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>]

Does the RENDER X extension work properly on your system?

(do you get errors like "Xlib: extension "RENDER" missing on display
:0.0" ?)

all I know is that my laptop (p3 600 w/ 128 megs of RAM running RedHat 9
w/ XD2 running default setup) sounds like it runs evolution faster than
your 2 gigahertz + 2gig of ram desktop machine, which seems a bit
strange... no? I'll grant you that w/ 128 megs of ram and a 256 meg swap
partition, things are not exactly snappy - but redraws and plenty fast.

the browser config setting thing has more to do with what arguments you
pass to the browser command-line than a bug in GNOME. If I try to launch
mozilla more than once on my machine from the command-line, it often
won't let me - asking me to select a different profile.

you probably need to do something like: mozilla --new-window

(you'd have to read up on the mozilla command-line options to know for
sure, I was just making that one up).

what other preferences "get ignored"? They all seem to work fine for
me...

Jeff

On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 11:32, Paul Hands wrote:
> Jeff,
>
> You may well be right regarding configuration, but what in
> particular?  I suspect that something is wrong with my gnome
> configuration in general, because I cannot get evolution to open a web
> browser if one is already running - all my settings in
> gnome-control-center seem to get ignored.  I "fixed" it by changing
> the mozilla script in the mozilla installation.
>
> So far, as you say, all responses seem to be from SuSE 8.2 users. 
> However, 1.2.2 is OK on the same setup.
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 16:07, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: 
> > sounds like your system is incorrectly configured. This is certainly
> > *not* an evolution bug if it is only reproducable on SuSE 8.2 (which
> > seems to be the case based on other responses in this thread).
> >
> > Make sure that hardware acceleration is working properly
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> > On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 07:27, Paul Hands wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > Should I submit the following as a bug?
> > >
> > > I'm running evolution 1.4.4 (and also the latest snaps - no
> > > difference) on KDE 3.1 (various versions - 3.1.1, 3.1.3) on SuSE 8.2. 
> > > System is a 2Ghz IBM T30 laptop with 2G RAM, Radeon mobility graphics
> > > adaptor, XFree86-4.3.0-15.
> > >
> > > The graphics performance is awful.  
> > >
> > > Anything which causes a window redraw (without changing window sizes)
> > > takes around 8 seconds to complete.  That includes changing folders -
> > > something which happens a lot.  The redraw of the summary and preview
> > > panes takes the most time - the folder bar needs about 3 seconds to
> > > look complete.  
> > >
> > > If I resize the window (main or composer)  the redraw can take up to
> > > 30 seconds.  During that time, the mouse cursor is grabbed, and is
> > > restricted to a screen area which seems to be the old size of the
> > > window.
> > >
> > > If I switch into a gnome session (gnome 2.2 as supplied with the SuSE
> > > distro) instead of KDE, graphics performance is fine.
> > >
> > > I don't want to start a gnome versus KDE thread here - it serves no
> > > purpose.  However, I bet a lot of evolution users are on KDE as well,
> > > and therefore I'd like to know..............
> > >
> > > 1. Is it just me, or are other KDE users seeing this.  If so, what
> > > distro etc?
> > > 2. Is it restricted to Evolution, or are other gnome apps affected in
> > > the same way?  
> > >
> > > and of course,
> > >
> > > 3. Is it worth submitting a bug?
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Paul
-- 
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
fejj ximian com  - www.ximian.com