Okay so it's not official. And like I mentioned I hadn't run into it myself until I was testing a website I developed for a client. But I've been seeing for of them recently, so it's not a bad idea to add the type sometime in the not so distant future.... On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 01:48, Not Zed wrote:
On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 15:36, Edward Muller wrote:Actually there is. :-) I ran into Windows setting this as a mime type when I was working on a web application for a client. Google for it... http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=pjpeg&btnG=Google+SearchUh, but there isn't any such beast at the official mime media types page at: http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/ So is some brain-dead client using a non-registered media type for jpeg data, without even using the x-atom syntax? I always thought progressive jpeg's were just part of a normal jpeg, it would not require a new media type. What is the content-type set to in the part header? If its something that has changed with a newer version of evolution, it sounds more like gnome-vfs or something, since we only (*ever*) support 'image/jpeg' in our code (among some other image types). There is absolutely no way 'this worked in 1.4.0' if it was being identified as image/pjpeg since the inlinable image types are hardcoded and hasn't changed for years.
-- Edward Muller Interlix (http://www.interlix.com) Phone: 417-862-0573 - Cell: 417-844-2435 - Fax: 417-862-0572 Web Hosting - PC Service & Support - Custom Programming - Network Service & Support Specializing in Open Source Solutions
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part