Re: [Evolution] Re: 1st try at 1.1.1 (now works)

["Lance A. Brown" <lance bearcircle net>]

On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 10:01, Xavier Bestel wrote:

> With 1.0.8 it's rather acceptable: you just have to restart Evolution to
> get it to rescan properly the mailboxes. But 1.1.1 seems really unable
> to connect concurrently to 1.0.8 (didn't try two 1.1.1 instances
> together: I need at least one computer with a working mailer).
>
> Maybe it's Cyrus imapd's fault, but I already had to migrate from
> uw-imapd because Evolution didn't like the latter; then which imapd
> suits Evolution's need ?

I ran into a lot of connection problems if I accidentally ran two copies
of Evo, on different machines, connecting to the same IMAP store.  They
would alternately get 'connection lost' errors.  This was before I
switched from uw-imap to courier-imap.

uw-imap with large mailboxes was unacceptably slow.  Courier-imap is a
much better performer.

--[Lance]

-- 
Carolina Spirit Quest - www.carolinaspiritquest.org
Celebrate The Circle  - www.angelfire.com/nc/celebratethecircle/