Re: [Evolution] Reply to all should include myself
- From: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- To: David Hoover <karma deadmoose com>
- Cc: Gregory Leblanc <gleblanc linuxweasel com>, Evolution List <evolution ximian com>
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] Reply to all should include myself
- Date: 09 May 2002 10:37:17 +0930
Why would you ever want to read something you've written yourself?
If you need to (to point out how wrong Y was in talking about X),
there's always the sent folder.
On Thu, 2002-05-09 at 09:05, David Hoover wrote:
On Wed, 2002-05-08 at 16:18, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
On Wed, 2002-05-08 at 15:18, David Hoover wrote:
I have to disagree (which I did when I filed a bug about this & it got
closed with the same response):
If I'm on the recipient list of a message, and hit reply to all, I want
my address kept in the cc list.
If I'm sending a quick note my girlfriend saying "I'm heading home now",
I don't want to cc myself.
So it doesn't seem unreasonable to want 'reply to all' to actually reply
to everyone who was a recipient of the message.
Sounds to me like you really want a mailing list. :-) Then replies to
the group come back to you, via the mailing list. This works pretty
well for the webmaster gnome or group.
Yes, but what if a thread starts up between me, Joe, and Bob. I don't
really want to make a mailing list davidandjoeandbob deadmoose com for
this one conversation, even if it drags on for a few days.
So yes, when a mailing list is appropriate, it makes sense, but they're
not always appropriate for all messages that you might send to a group
evolution maillist - evolution ximian com
] [Thread Prev