Re: [Evolution] Is there a way to mark a message as *important* when sending??



I agree, that's not a professional comment. The original author was
simply pointing out that some else had figured out a way to do something
similar, not that something was better or even that it could be applied
to Evolution.

Take care,

Seth
seth Hollen org

On Sun, 2002-06-02 at 22:20, Ken Barber wrote:
    This is an example of the attitude that I spoke of in my first post to this 
    list.
    
    Apparently no one is allowed to challenge any statements by the developers 
    claiming that something cannot be done, even when there is proof that someone 
    else IS doing it.
    
    If they're not interested in improving Evolution, then I believe that I am 
    wasting my time here.
    
    Have a good life.
    
    Ken Barber
    -- 
    "It is only your own knowledge that you can claim to possess or ask others to 
    consider.  Your mind is your only judge of truth -- and if others dissent 
    from your verdict, reality is the court of final appeal."
              --Ayn Rand, "Atlas Shrugged"
    
    
    On Sunday 02 June 2002 04:07 am, Not Zed wrote:
    > On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 03:30, Ken Barber wrote:
    > > On Thursday 30 May 2002 03:14 am, Not Zed wrote:
    > > > If we mark a message 'urgent' there's no saying that any client will do
    > > > anythign with it, infact there isn't a 'standard' way to indicate such
    > > > a thing anyway.  So if we did it, it would probably be messy and only
    > > > work fully with another copy of evolution.
    > >
    > > It works just fine in KMail.....
    >
    > This happens to be a list about evolution, if you hadn't noticed.
    
    







[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]