Re: [Evolution] Stripping .sig's in replies

On Fri, 2002-04-19 at 10:38, Jason Kohles wrote:
On Fri, 2002-04-19 at 10:19, Dan Winship wrote:
4.  When "nuke-a-sig" is run, start at the end of the message, and only
read back <n> (user configurable?) lines to get to the delimiter.

There's no reason to make it user configurable. And I'd suggest "5" for

That's a good reason to make it configurable, I'd argue that the bigger
the sig, the more it needs stripping.

Then that's a lousy reason to make it configurable. Having a
configuration option means "we think some people only want to strip
small signatures, but other people want to strip large signatures too,
so you can decide".

What you're arguing for is "it shouldn't be based on the number of
lines, you just need to have a smarter algorithm"

-- Dan

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]