Re: [Evolution] reply

["Thomas O'Dowd" <tom nooper com>]

On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 09:23:25PM -0500, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Sat, 2001-10-27 at 13:41, Miles Lane wrote:
> > On Sat, 2001-10-27 at 06:33, Ed Wilts wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2001-10-27 at 04:59, Bognar Attila wrote:
> > >
> > > > How can I reply to the sender when the email arrived from a mailing
> > > > list?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > From:    foo-user bar com
> > > > Reply-To: foo-list bar-list com
> > > > To:     foo-list bar-list com
> > > >
> > > > When I choose reply to sender, reply or reply to all, every possibility
> > > > results in the same thing: I am replying to the list
> > >
> > > In a way, I don't disagree with Evolution's approach here:  there is an
> > > explicit Reply-To: header that says that replies should go to the list,
> > > and Evo's honoring that.  However, if I remember right, Kmail had a
> > > feature that allowed you to right-click on an e-mail address in the
> > > header and then reply to that address instead.  A feature like this
> > > would be useful.
> >
> > Just double-click on the e-mail address.  This feature is already
> > supported.
>
> Close, but not quite.  This creates a *new* e-mail address, and does not
> do a reply to the current one.  You'll end up having to manually cut and
> paste the old message, add the appropriate ">", etc.

Perhaps add a note to bug 3258 which is marked as a wishlist. Its for
a more general right-click menu on the mail message.

Tom.
-- 
Thomas O'Dowd. - Nooping - http://nooper.com
tom nooper com - Testing - http://nooper.co.jp/labs