Re: [Evolution] GPGME?

From: Ettore Perazzoli <ettore ximian com>
To: Dan Winship <danw ximian com>
Cc: Evolution Mailing List <evolution ximian com>
Subject: Re: [Evolution] GPGME?
Date: 13 Apr 2001 11:13:03 -0400

On 13 Apr 2001 19:59:00 +0500, Dan Winship wrote:

Yes. Because it's not free. :)

Specifically, GPG can't deal with stuff sent from PGP 2, because it uses
encumbered algorithms. But then, PGP 2 is getting pretty old now. Maybe
everyone has migrated to either GPG or PGP5/6 (which are interoperable)
at this point.


  Hmm good point, I completely forgot about this issue.

We could kill PGP support and see if anyone complained.


  Yeah, I wonder how many PGP users are left.  All the people I know
have migrated to GPG.

-- 
Ettore

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Evolution] GPGME?
  - From: Dan Winship
- [Evolution] Re: GPGME?
  - From: Konrad Neuwirth

References:
- [Evolution] GPGME?
  - From: Ross Burton
- Re: [Evolution] GPGME?
  - From: Ettore Perazzoli
- Re: [Evolution] GPGME?
  - From: Jeffrey Stedfast
- Re: [Evolution] GPGME?
  - From: Ettore Perazzoli
- Re: [Evolution] GPGME?
  - From: Dan Winship

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]