[Evolution-hackers] Re: Selecting/Unselecting Sources
- From: JP Rosevear <jpr ximian com>
- To: Tuomas Kuosmanen <tigert ximian com>
- Cc: Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo ximian com>, Evolution Hackers Mailing List <evolution-hackers ximian com>, hpj <hpj ximian com>, Chris Toshok <toshok ximian com>
- Subject: [Evolution-hackers] Re: Selecting/Unselecting Sources
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 09:33:49 -0500
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 09:00, Tuomas Kuosmanen wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 11:21, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-01-18 at 22:10 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote:
> > > Basically the UI for showing/hiding calendar sources and selecting a
> > > primary source sucks pretty bad. It allows inconsistencies in the UI.
> > > I've been playing around with this a bit and keep coming up with two
> > > issues:
> > >
> > > 1. Does it make sense to allow a "primary" calendar (the one
> > > highlighted) to not be checked (shown in the view to the right). What
> > > does Apple's Ical do?
> > >
> > hmm, good question, since that primary calendar will be used as the
> > default for a lot of operations, while not being selected, which could
> > make the user think her new appointment wasn't saved, since it wont show
> > up in the calendar views.
>
> I think this makes sense. I'll check what ical does in a moment, but I
> think it is good that there is always at least one calendar visible. I
> mean, it is possible that it is the only calendar even, so hiding it
> is kind of silly.
I'm unclear - what part makes sense?
-JP
--
JP Rosevear <jpr ximian com>
Ximian, Inc.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]