Re: [Evolution-hackers] Bug #50046.

On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 09:08 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> I don't think it is even supported by rfc2822 anymore anyway, is it? I
> seem to recall seeing that it was a deprecated syntax.

�3.4 makes no mention of it being deprecated...

group           =       display-name ":" [mailbox-list / CFWS] ";"

It goes on to explicitly describe the usage which I'm used to....

   When it is desirable to treat several mailboxes as a single unit
   (i.e., in a distribution list), the group construct can be used.  The
   group construct allows the sender to indicate a named group of
   recipients. This is done by giving a display name for the group,
   followed by a colon, followed by a comma separated list of any number
   of mailboxes (including zero and one), and ending with a semicolon.
   Because the list of mailboxes can be empty, using the group construct
   is also a simple way to communicate to recipients that the message
   was sent to one or more named sets of recipients, without actually
   providing the individual mailbox address for each of those


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]