Re: [Evolution-hackers] Bug #50046.
- From: Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>
- To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2 infradead org>
- Cc: guenther <guenther rudersport de>, Not Zed <notzed ximian com>, evolution-hackers ximian com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Bug #50046.
- Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 09:10:18 -0500
it's an empty group. it's syntactically meaningless. it's like extra
whitespace between addresses... it's not needed.
Jeff
On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 06:57, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 12:05 +0100, guenther wrote:
> > Sorry, my bad. Now I see. Although my understanding of your initial
> > explanation didn't change, not even with more coffee. ;)
>
> :)
>
> > Yep, I noticed the missing To: field myself. But it seems, this is due
> > to the formatting of that header:
> >
> > To: People who needed an example of empty lists in To field:;People who needed an example of empty lists in To field: ;, ""@infradead.org
>
> That happened between me and you, and it wasn't done by any of my boxen.
> I have this (I'm attaching the same message, but Evo might munge it even
> when it's attached):
>
> pentafluge /home/dwmw2/Maildir/cur $ grep ^To: ./1073299527.H151846P27187.pentafluge.infradead.org:2,S
> To: People who needed an example of empty lists in To field: ;
> pentafluge /home/dwmw2/Maildir/cur $
>
> ... leading to the To: header being completely omitted from the display.
> Perhaps if it had other addresses in it too then it wouldn't be
> completely removed, as NotZed says.
>
> > However, I actually *have* seen the behavior in Evolution, as you want.
> > The message was generated by Eudora and the To: field had some
> > explanatory text, whereas all the addresses where not visible, cause
> > they where sent Bcc:ed.
> >
> > So I assume, this is Evolutions fault parsing the To: header?
>
> Evo seems to have parsed it just fine, but decided for some reason to
> discard part of it.
>
> --
> dwmw2
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2 infradead org>
> Subject: Bcc and lists in To:
> Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 10:43:16 +0000
>
>
> By way of example... this message (sent from pine because Evo can't send
> them like this) has a list in the To: field which explains why you're
> getting this mail.
>
> It says:
> To: People who needed an example of empty lists in To field: ;
>
> Evolution strips the To: header from the mail before sending it, and even
> strips it on _displaying_ the mail. Unless you look at it in another MUA
> you're unlikely to see it, even if you select 'View Mail Source'.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]