Re: [Evolution-hackers] Bug #50046.
- From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2 infradead org>
- To: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- Cc: evolution-hackers ximian com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Bug #50046.
- Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 12:03:24 +0000
On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 22:03 +1030, Not Zed wrote:
> It strips the group, but other addresses aren't lost.
I hadn't tried it with other addresses.
> > and when displaying a received mail, even with 'Show Email Source' IIRC.
> True, but such syntax is rarely used.
That is not my experience; I actually see it quite a lot -- many people
who went to University in the UK in the last few years seem to have
learned how to do this.
Undergrads soon learn that putting a huge list of recipients in the To:
and Cc: fields would cause storms of replies, and start to use Bcc.
Since RFC822 forbade messages with neither To: or Cc:, pine would make
the To: header say:
To: Undisclosed recipients : ;
... and it wasn't long before people started typing their own
explanatory text in place of that.
] [Thread Prev