Re: [Evolution-hackers] libical import

[Hans Petter Jansson <hpj ximian com>]

On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 02:54, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 04:03, Hans Petter Jansson wrote:

> > Broken clocks...

> 	Will cause all manner of other problems.

Well, true. In the end, I guess I'm just a good old-fashined hard-liner
:) I like to think I'm not unreasonable, though, so I checked in the
generated sources yesterday.


> > I believe the same argument can be made for configure and Makefile.in. A
> > lot of people have problems with automake et al, problems that would be
> > solved if you could build CVS source just like a tarball. So shouldn't
> > we keep that in CVS too?

> 	Well; clearly a balance is appropriate - however presumably versions of
> auto* that ship on recent systems are sufficient. FWIW - OO.o not only
> stores the generated configure script in CVS, but also a load of
> architecture-specific, patched, zipped mozilla binaries[1] ;-)
> 
> 	So clearly some balance is needed,

Just poking fun, Michael :)

--
Hans Petter