Re: [Evolution-hackers] sharing IMAP folders between users

[JT Moree <moreejt pcxperience com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

incidentally,  I still havent heard from sales about contracting this work.

Not Zed wrote:
| It depends somewhat on how the shared folders are presented in imap.
|
| Another namespace?  Current imap code doesn't support multiple
| namespaces, although most of the support required is there, so it would
| only be a couple of days work I think.
|
| The imap code also doesn't handle async flag updates very well, but that
| depends on how the server implements the shared folders.
|
| Implementing IMAP ACL (is that still only standards track?) would
| require some low-level camel (mail library) api support.  And the code
| to do it, and to honour it.
|
| If it is done via a namespace, then that is all that would be required
| to implement it, but if they dont show up in list without listing
| explictly (?) then some other ui will be needed too.  Courier seems to
| put them in the LIST output, and they're added either globally or
| manually by running shell commands on the host.
|
| None of the servers I have implement ACL ... courier just does it using
| chmod/etc.
|
| I've cc'd sales re contracting work.
|
|  Michael
|
|
| On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 02:50, JT Moree wrote:
|
|>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|>Hash: SHA1
|>
|>File->Open Other User's Folder
|
|
|>Ours is NOT grayed out.  Running it lets us click around
|>*the Account dropdown is empty.
|>*the user feature seems to work.
|>*the folder name has some entries in the drop down and you put something in the edit field.
|>
|>We may do the work to make this talk to an IMAP server?
|>
|>Even better, what would it cost for us to contract Ximian to do it?
|>
|>
|>Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
|>| On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 09:33, Dan Winship wrote:
|>|
|>|>>I dont have the connector installed and the command IS showing up.
|>|>
|>|>Yes, that's a known bug. It's not *supposed* to show up though.
|>|
|>|
|>| It shows up even if you don't have Connector, but it does gray it out so
|>| it can't be used.
|>|
|>| -- Ettore
|>|
|>
|>- --
|>JT Moree
|>Xperience, Inc.
|>www.XperienceInc.com
|>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|>Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
|>Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
|>
|>iD8DBQE+8J9qVC8yzAIEMZ8RAlroAJ9VowJiTn8NoW1UM57+RD4165I9/QCfe8iU
|>vNRF9r0Ip//PQn3piq0vW1s=
|>=5Mne
|>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|>
|
|
|

- --
JT Moree
Xperience, Inc.
www.XperienceInc.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE+9hzuVC8yzAIEMZ8RAg3IAJ4oRdpy8hbVcaSTs22YF2ilnyG6JwCeIdNS
n9BI+/NU0nZKMR6s+ZQqMmA=
=9zK+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.