Re: [Evolution-hackers] Multi-line boundary



On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 07:59, Sean Atkinson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for your response.
> 
> > are you sure that librfc822-1.0 is reporting about that Content-Type
> > line? from the sounds of the error, it doesn't sound like it is...
> No I wasn't sure because the output was kind of sparse.  Looking into it
> it was actually only supposed to be parsing addresses anyway, and I
> can't see how to hack it into checking a full message body.
> 
> > also, afaict - that Content-Type line looks correct, the second line is
> > indented with lwsp.
> > 
> > as far as I'm aware, camel has no problems parsing multi-line headers.
> If this message appears kosher I'll give up on verifying it with
> librfc822 and focus on Evo instead.  Even if the message isn't 100%
> compliant it'd be nice if I didn't have to use web-mail to access it.
> 
> > what I am more likely to believe is that the BODY(STRUCTURE) response
> > contained an empty boundary string. This would make it a server bug and
> > is much much more likely.
> > 
> > To find out, you should just be able to do the following:
> > 
> > export CAMEL_VERBOSE_DEBUG=1; evolution-1.4 2>&1 > camel.log
> 
> Actually, I used:
> 
> CAMEL_VERBOSE_DEBUG=1 evolution > camel.log 2>&1
> 
> [ The bash(1) man page explains its strange redirection syntax. ]

it's the same either way...

> 
> Anyhow, it didn't seem to output anything useful.  There's a bunch of
> IMAP traffic indicating the message is already fetched, but no more
> camel debug.

did you see a BODY or BODYSTRUCTURE fetch command? what were the
contents?

if you didn't see one, then the message is probably cached. you'll need
to rm -rf ~/evolution/mail/imap/<account>/folders

then start evo again and try to get a log this time... 

Jeff

-- 
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
fejj ximian com  - www.ximian.com




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]