Re: Why is 2.16.3 not 2.16.3??

[Beartooth <Beartooth swva net>]

On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:04:14 -0800, Peter Gordon wrote:

> This usually means that you have already installed the package, so Yum
> just ignores the request and exits (since you've not passed any other
> packages as arguments to download and install). 
> 
> Are you sure you have run this on both the machines? Have you fully
> exited and restarted Epiphany?

Well, I tried rpm -q -- and it said they were not installed. So I closed
Epiphany -- something I may indeed not have done before, though I doubt it
-- and gave the yum install command again. This time I got them.

Many thanks!

-- 
Beartooth Staffwright, PhD, Neo-Redneck Linux Convert
Remember I know precious little of what I am talking about.