Re: [Usability] Re: [Epiphany] epiphany toolbar/bookmarks
- From: Stephen Blake <seb iostream org>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <mmagallo debian org>, usability gnome org,epiphany mozdev org
- Subject: Re: [Usability] Re: [Epiphany] epiphany toolbar/bookmarks
- Date: 30 May 2003 15:22:50 -0400
On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 14:45, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 05:48:17PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > > - Searches are currently not very "rich", so if you have 2000
> > > bookmarks, it can be hard to find them. But on the long time a
> > > database approach is obviously the best also for people with so many
> > > bookmarks.
> >
> > With a large collection there's another problem: the list of topics is
> > also potentially large. Just finding a topic is in itself a difficult
> > task. I'm not sure if there's a solution for this problem (other than
> > just "that's your problem, think of better topics" -- well, I'm not a
> > librarian, ook?)
>
> It seems like there might be some cheesy hack to allow topics to be
> hierarchized; for example, I can imagine creating topics with "/" in
> the name:
>
> Foo/Bar
> Foo/Baz
>
> Would it be a total hack if that was magically used to generate
> submenus? Probably so. ;-)
How about a not-so-cheesy tree hack solution: Imagine the following list
of bookmarks and their categories (with apologies to any BSD zealots out
there ;) ):
Slashdot: News, Zealotry
OSNews: News, Operating Systems
FreeBSD: Operating Systems, Zealotry
CNN: News
I can imagine the following (but not the only) tree we could generate
from this (monospaced font required), where a * is a bookmark.
All
+- News
| +- Zealotry
| | +- * Slashdot
| +- * Slashdot
| +- * OSNews
| +- * CNN
+- Zealotry
| +- News
| | +- * Slashdot
| +- Operating Systems
| | +- * FreeBSD
| +- * Slashdot
| +- * FreeBSD
+- Operating Systems
+- Zealotry
| +- * FreeBSD
+- * OSNews
+- * FreeBSD
Hmm, too complicated? Maybe. Too many duplicate entries? Perhaps. But
maybe it's a start. Maybe we eliminate the (possibly very large)
intersection lists, forcing the user to navigate to the most specific
instance, i.e.:
All
+- News
| +- Zealotry
| | +- * Slashdot
| +- * OSNews
| +- * CNN
+- Zealotry
| +- News
| | +- * Slashdot
| +- Operating Systems
| | +- * FreeBSD
+- Operating Systems
+- Zealotry
| +- * FreeBSD
+- * OSNews
Well, it's obviously not a fully baked idea, but what do you think?
Stephen
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]