Re: Getting GNOME page on gnome.org

[Andreas Nilsson <andreas andreasn se>]

On 04/02/2012 03:36 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 03:10:35PM +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
> > I'm sure that wasn't your intention, but you're coming across as
> > rude & demanding here. The image of my son shouting "I don't want to
> > take a bath" comes to mind.
> >
> > There may be good reasons to include or exclude Mageia from the list
> > - and I'm sure that we can all work through those reasons without
> > being too demanding.
>
>
> The criteria given is straightforward: Mageia doesn't provide a good
> GNOME experience by default, nor does it have a webpage explaining how
> to get the full experience. Getting a new webpage for this in a good
> place (and not just put somewhere @ Mageia to meet the criteria) is
> something I don't involve myself with in Mageia. So for now it should
> not be there. If something changes, of course I'll ask it to be
> included again, but for now it is incorrect to have it.
(Just a quick note that I didn't read Olav's response to my e-mail as rude)
Given that the Mageia website is, as you say, very sparse about 
information on how to get GNOME 3, I agree that we should remove the link.
Hopefully it will be possible to add it back at some point in the future 
(when version 2 is stable I assume).
- Andreas