Re: [Ekiga-list] [GUADEC 2013 Proposal]

[Víctor M. Jáquez L. <vjaquez igalia com>]

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 06:32:27PM +0200, Genghis Khan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 15 May 2013 14:07:45 +0200
> Víctor M. Jáquez L. <vjaquez igalia com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 01:55:45PM +0200, Damien Sandras wrote:
> > > Bad news.
> > >
> > > That probably means GNOME has now less or no interest in Ekiga
> > > anymore.
> >
> > Yes, though, it is a fact that we are not keeping the pace of gnome,
> > with it's library dependencies and user interface design.
>
> What exactly is missing or wrong in Ekiga?

There's nothing missing or wrong in Ekiga per se. 

But if we want to think in Ekiga as a component of GNOME (3.x) we shall admit
that Ekiga doesn't follow the UI design and the migration to GTK+ 3.x,
GSettings, GStreamer, etc., is a bit lagged behind.

vmjl

> It seems that many are satisfied with the many improved performances of
> Ekiga in recent year, and is constantly being updated in repositories
> such as Slackware and Salix OS.
>
> http://slackbuilds.org/repository/14.0/network/ekiga/
>
> > vmjl