Re: [Ekiga-devel-list] Code in lib/engine/components/opal/

[Julien Puydt <jpuydt free fr>]

Le 31/01/2013 10:49, Eugen Dedu a Ãcrit :
> On 31/01/13 10:42, Julien Puydt wrote:
> > Le 31/01/2013 10:32, Eugen Dedu a Ãcrit :
> > > Instead of dialect, couldn't we use Chat or IM?
> >
> > IM is too short, and we already use Chat for an ongoing discussion (in
> > the form of Ekiga::SimpleChat and Ekiga::MultipleChat... I hate those
> > names :-/ )
>
> Opal uses OpalIM, maybe use EkigaIM ? It is fairly descriptive...

Ekiga::EkigaIM doesn't look more descriptive than Ekiga::IM... I still 
think IM is too short and undescriptive.

> Still, I do not understand: is Dialect a variant of something? Which is
> the name of that Something? Is there other Dialect class, which is its
> name?
>
> Or it is generic, and in that case Dialect does not make much sense?

Ekiga::Dialect is an abstract class, and we have a Loudmouth::Dialect 
and an Opal::Dialect (perhaps also an Echo::Dialect in some test code), 
and I think that a name like Protocol::Dialect is quite descriptive!

Snark