Re: [Ekiga-devel-list] A final problem

[Damien Sandras <dsandras seconix com>]

Le mardi 09 décembre 2008 à 22:52 +0100, Eugen Dedu a écrit :
> Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Damien Sandras <dsandras seconix com> wrote:
> >> Le lundi 08 décembre 2008 à 22:25 +0100, Eugen Dedu a écrit :
> >>> Finally, after
> >>>
> >>> ./configure --enable-maintainer-mode --build x86_64-linux-gnu
> >>> --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --disable-schemas-install
> >>> --disable-scrollkeeper
> >>>
> >>> I have:
> >>>
> >>> ================ Final configuration ===================
> >>>            Installing into prefix  :  /usr
> >>>
> >>>                     GNOME support  :  disabled
> >>>
> >>> Why is the gnome support disabled??
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Also, if you know, please tell me if the following debian
> >>> build-dependencies are still needed:
> >>>         libgnome2-dev,
> >>>         libgnomeui-dev,
> >>>
> >> I see this in configure.ac, so yes, they are still needed, otherwise
> >> GNOME support is disabled :
> >> PKG_CHECK_MODULES([GNOME], [libgnome-2.0 >= 2.14.0 libgnomeui-2.0 >=
> >> 2.14.0], [found_gnome=yes])
> > 
> > I noticed gnome.h is used in one spot still in src/gui/callbacks.cpp
> > but once that is gone I would think the whole check for 'gnome' can be
> > removed. Other than that what is now the difference between the gnome
> > and gtk version?
> 
> If I understood correctly, the difference is also the gconf settings: in 
> the gconf database or in files; this was also the difference between 
> gtk-only package and the gnome one.  Could someone confirm if it's true?

You can now compile with or without gconf and with or without gnome
indepdantly, ie "no gconf but gnome" and "gconf but not gnome" are now
possible.
-- 
 _     Damien Sandras
(o-      
//\    Ekiga Softphone : http://www.ekiga.org/
v_/_   Be IP           : http://www.beip.be/
       FOSDEM          : http://www.fosdem.org/
       SIP Phone       : sip:dsandras ekiga net