On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 00:12 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > the main benefit is using well-tested code of a standard library > instead > of shipping own implementations. So far the code works fine and isn't complex enough in my mind to need replacement. Moreover, it isn't really our own implementation but just an improved version from Kerberos krb4-1.2.2. > Can you try the patch below instead? > > cu > Adrian I don't really have time right now since I don't have the music that caused the problems anymore. If I get some more, and if I have time, I can give your patch a try. You sent it inline though. I have asked the project maintainer several times now with no response where the repository is located, since an actual svn diff against head would be the best way to do this. -- Kip Warner -- Software Developer President & CEO Kshatra Corp. OpenPGP encrypted/signed mail preferred http://www.thevertigo.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part