Re: [Easytag-mailing] Easytag Major Performance Fix
- From: Adrian Bunk <bunk stusta de>
- To: Kip Warner <kip thevertigo com>
- Cc: easytag-mailing lists sourceforge net
- Subject: Re: [Easytag-mailing] Easytag Major Performance Fix
- Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:46:16 +0300
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:38:36AM -0700, Kip Warner wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 08:37 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> > Instead of patching it, what about nuking src/base64.c completely in
> > favor of the g_base64_{de,en}code() that were added in glib 2.12?
> >
> > Would you test the performance if I'd send you a patch?
> >
> > cu
> > Adrian
>
> Hey Adrian,
Hi Kip,
> It sounds like a good idea, but it might not be the best thing right
> now. Glib 2.12 was when those routines were added and right now
> libglib-dev virtual package has libglib1.2-dev still as it's dependency
libglib2.0-dev is what you are looking for.
> (at least for GNU users running Jaunty as far as I know). So I'm
> thinking 2.x branch may not be considered stable yet.
2.x is stable since 2002.
> I'm also not sure
> how available it will be on non-free platforms. It's probably there,
> just one more thing to add complications to at build time. My patch
> doesn't require us to change or add dependencies fortunately.
EasyTAG already requires glib >= 2.8.0 directly, and through it's
dependency on GTK+ >= 2.12.0 it indirectly requires glib >= 2.14.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]