Re: thanks for nothing - a look at the uninstaller
- From: Michael Ross <michael e ross gmail com>
- To: Andrey Repin <anrdaemon freemail ru>, discussions about usage and development of dia <dia-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: thanks for nothing - a look at the uninstaller
- Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 11:25:00 -0500
Good software incorporates human factors.
Has anyone else seen the paragraphs of text where each word is shown only with the correct first and last letters - all the rest are jumbled?
http://www.ecenglish.com/learnenglish/lessons/can-you-read
We (well maybe natives to a language) can amazingly, read this apparent gibberish and make very good sense of it, at lease with English... (I wonder if all manners of writing support this? Chinese logographs for example. Or
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_writing_systems ) It is effortless once you get going. Our minds lever what is essentially a lack of attention to detail into a method for comprehending messed up information.
That ability also messes us up for proper comprehension of detailed information. I have examples of spec sheets and manuals that are so concise as to be unreadable. I have some instructions from a German company that are sort of beautiful in their sparseness, but it is incredibly hard to sort out if you are not already fully understanding the system. The information is too dense and not enough context is given. You almost have to diagram the sentences to make sense of it.
Dialog boxes that pop up for quick review definitely need to be otherwise. There text needs some white space. Imagery is helpful (ideograms). Anything to shake us from a jaded autonomic response.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]